Đề thi viết IELTS đề 1 - Mã đề WPT1 - T12 - 2019

2Câu
60phút
13-08-2022

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make any comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

[object Object]

Nhập bài luận của bạn bên dưới và nhấp vào nộp bài để hoàn thành

Bạn có 20 phút để hoàn thành bài viết {{ taskId }}.

Bài viết mẫu
The table presented is a summary of the views of the members of a sports club regarding 3 factors; its activities, opening hours and amenities. The figures given are in percentages. Overall, more females were satisfied with the opening hours and the club's facilities than males. Males, on the other hand, liked the range of activities better than females. Regarding club facilities, the difference between the opinions of males and females was little, as most liked the amenities and a smaller percentage was dissatisfied with them. In terms of the range of activities, a higher percentage of males were very satisfied in comparison to females, that is 55% to 35%. 40% of males were just satisfied in comparison with the 35% of females who were just satisfied. Lastly, only a very small percentage of males were dissatisfied as compared to the females who had nearly a third of their number in this category. The disparity between males and females' views on club facilities was less, when compared to views on other factors, as similar percentages were seen in all categories. 64% of females and 63% of males were very satisfied, 22% of females and 27% of males were just satisfied and 14% of females and 10% of males were dissatisfied. Finally, almost all females included in this survey were satisfied with the opening time of the club as compared to the males, as only slightly over half shared the same impression. Only 3% of females were dissatisfied in comparison to a whopping 37% of males in this category.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others.

Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding.

Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

[object Object]

Nhập bài luận của bạn bên dưới và nhấp vào nộp bài để hoàn thành

Bạn có 20 phút để hoàn thành bài viết {{ taskId }}.

Bài viết mẫu
The modern society has various needs and requires the work of some specialists in some fields in order to keep society running. Some have therefore named some of these fields so essential that they suggest that the government should fund students in such courses. However, I believe such an educational policy, would come with more cons than pros. First and foremost, such a programme would call for masses choking the system in order to benefit from such an attractive offer. The modern world may have made a lot of advancement but economic wellbeing cannot be described as its forte. Many people struggle financially and will most definitely grasp at straw to avoid drowning. It would not be surprising, therefore, if the government finds itself struggling to pay for a higher number of people than it bargained for. For instance, while in high school, a scholarship was put in place for cocoa farmers' wards who pursued General Science as a course in the secondary level. Many farmers coerced their wards to pursue this course in order to benefit from this offer. Unfortunately, this scholarship had to be withdrawn as too many people rushed for the limited funding available. This could be the story of the government in a few years to come, should they follow through with this policy. Moreover, a shortage of people in the supposedly 'relatively irrelevant' courses is expected. Most of these courses, if not all, bear more importance than we associate with them. What society deems 'relevant' is only so because society made it so, as every single person in any tertiary institution aims at serving the country in one way or the other. This mindset of one course being more important than the other does nothing but invalidate the dreams of some young people such that they may drop the goal of working in a particular field in order to remain 'relevant' to society. Consequently, the seemingly less relevant fields would have few specialists and people seeking products from these sectors will have no one to look to. One may argue that this policy of funding students who study relevant subjects would be a generous hand held out for the needy who have the talent for these courses. However, this seemingly benevolent policy will wreak more havoc than the good it is meant to achieve, as proven above.
Câu đã xong
0/2
Thời gian thi
00:00
Chuyển nhanh đến câu hỏi
test-time

Bình luận ()